GeneaBlogger

Wednesday, March 2, 2022

Street Family Updated

 My very first post here was about the Street family of Modoc county, California. Much has come to light in the last nine years, so here is a revised and updated version of that extensive analysis:


The Family Origin of Zedekiah Street of Modoc co. CA

The identification of the parents and siblings of Zedekiah Street, an early settler of Modoc co. CA, has been a genealogical project of some complication. A long series of circumstantial evidence has convinced this writer that Zedekiah was the son of Joseph and Margaret (Carmichael) Street. The purpose of this paper is to outline the evidence which has led to this conclusion.

I.  DIRECT FAMILY KNOWLEDGE.  At the time this study began, two of the grandchildren of Zedekiah Street were living—Olin Street Johnson and Elma Caroline (Johnson) Craig.  Olin was old enough to remember his grandfather well, having been 11 1/2 when Zedekiah died; furthermore, the Johnson family lived next door to the Streets during Olin’s childhood. Elma did not have many first-hand memories since she was several years younger; but she did live closer to her parents in their later years, and so had considerable information based on conversations with them. In talking with Olin and Elma, the following information emerged [based on notes taken by the writer from conversations with each of them]:

A.  Zedekiah Street came originally from “the South” (Olin thought it was Kentucky, but was not certain). He apparently came to Arkansas at some point because he was on a wagon train about 1860 from Arkansas to California which also included Caroline Hash and her sister, Emeline (Hash) Dodson), of Arkansas.

 

B.  He was married to Caroline Hash en route, in Denver, CO; they settled first in Camptonville, Yuba co. CA.

 

C.  After a few years in Camptonville, they moved to Surprise Valley in what is now Modoc co. CA (it was at that time Siskiyou co.).

 

D.  At some point in their early days there, they were joined by Zedekiah’s older brother, John Street. John died before either of these grandchildren were born, but they both remembered his widow, “Aunt Martha Street.” They believed that her maiden name was Robinson, or something similar.

 

II.  INFORMATION FROM CENSUS AND CEMETERY RECORDS.  Both Zedekiah and John Street are buried in the Cedarville Cemetery, Modoc co. CA; both appear in early census records from Modoc co.; and both also appear on the Great Register (of voters) for that county. These records add the following information:

A.  According to his tombstone, Zedekiah Street was born 11 Dec. 1826. (Note that the name on the tombstone is spelled “Zedikiah”; the spelling varies in different records, but it appears that “Zedekiah” is generally used in records such as voter registrations where he himself gave the information.) An obituary in the Surprise Valley Record gives his birth date as 11 Dec. 1828.  Normally one would give preference to the tombstone record; in this case, however, neither existing census records nor his Great Register listing support a birth year as early as 1826, and most suggest 1828/29.  All these sources also list his birthplace as Tennessee. [Sources: (1) Tombstone in Cedarville Cemetery, Cedarville, Modoc co. CA; a photograph of the tombstone is posted online at http://www.findagrave.com/; (2) 1870 census of Surprise Valley, Siskiyou co. CA, p. 14, line 16, where his age is give as 41; (3) 1880 census of Cedarville, Modoc co. CA, E.D. 67, p. 6, line 25, where is age is given as 52; (4) U. S. Census Year: 1900; Census Place: Cedarville, Modoc, California; Roll: 94; Page 5A; Enumeration District: 84, line 21; FHL microfilm: 1240094; (5) Great Register of Yuba co. CA, indicating he registered to vote 26 Feb 1867, giving his age as 38 (California State Library, California History Section; Great Registers, 1866-1898; Collection Number: 4 - 2A; CSL Roll Number: 140; FHL Roll Number: 978599, p. 96); (6) Great Register of Modoc co. CA, indicating he registered to vote 13 Sep. 1892, giving his age as 64 (California State Library, California History Section; Great Registers, 1866-1898; Collection Number: 4 - 2A; CSL Roll Number: 27; FHL Roll Number: 976938, image 142); (7) Great Register of Modoc co. CA, indicating he registered to vote 24 Apr 1875, giving his age as 44 (California State Library, California History Section; Great Registers, 1866-1898; Collection Number: 4 - 2A; CSL Roll Number: 27; FHL Roll Number: 976938. Image 15); (8) Obituary in the Surprise Valley Record, 25 Apr 1906.]

 

B.  John Street was born 12 Jan. 1816, according to his tombstone; and the date is supported by the 1880 census and Great Register records. John died in 1884, and thus only appears in Modoc co. in the 1880 census. Both census and Great Register list his birthplace as North Carolina. [Sources: (1) Tombstone in Cedarville Cemetery, Modoc co. CA; (2) U. S. Census (Year: 1880; Census Place: Cedarville, Modoc, California; Roll: 69; Family History Film: 1254069; Page: 4C; Enumeration District: 067; Image: 0009); (3) Great Register of Modoc co. CA, indicating he registerd to vote 5 May 1874, giving his age as 60 (California State Library, California History Section; Great Registers, 1866-1898; Collection Number: 4 - 2A; CSL Roll Number: 27; FHL Roll Number: 976938, image 7).]

 

C.  The 1880 census records for both brothers, and the 1900 census for  Zedekiah, agree that their father was born in Virginia and their mother in North Carolina.

 

D.  John Street’s wife, Martha Ann, is buried next to him, and her tombstone indicates her birth date was 14 Nov. 1831. A biographical sketch of their son James M Street [Source: An Illustrated History of Central Oregon (Western Publishing Co., 1905), p. 752] states that her maiden name was “Roberson,” and indicates that the John Street family lived in Putnam co. TN for many years prior to their migration to California about 1870; an obituary of one of John and Martha’s daughters, Margaret (Street) Wilder, confirms the connection to Putnam co. TN.

 

E.  A newspaper notice of the marriage of Zedekiah Street and Caroline Hash 17 June 1860 appeared in the Rocky Mountain News (Denver, 20 June 1860) and indicated that Zedekiah was from Madison co. AR. [Source: image of Rocky Mountain News, 17 June 1860, p. 3 on www.genealogybank.com, accessed 22 July 2012.]

 

F.  The 1900 census for  Zedekiah shows that there was living in his household a man named Richard L. Street, born in Arkansas in July 1851, identified as  Zedekiah’s nephew.  Also in the household was this Richard’s wife Mary and several children:

 

Richard L. Street        b. July 1851 AR                      father b. TN    mother b. ?

Mary (wife)                 b. March 1862 CA                  father b. TX    mother b. TX

May (dau.)                  b. May 1879  CA                    father b. AR    mother b. CA

Susie (dau.)                 b. March 1884 NV                  father b. AR    mother b. CA

Maggie (dau.)             b. March 1887 CA                  father b. AR    mother b. CA

Artie (son)                   b. Jan. 1889 MT                      father b. AR    mother b. CA

Gussie (dau.)               b. Jan. 1891 CA                      father b.  AR   mother b. CA

Hugh (son)                  b. Nov. 1892  CA                    father b. AR    mother b. CA

Thomas (son)              b. Feb. 1882 NV                     father b. AR    mother b. CA

 

[Source: Year: 1900; Census Place: Cedarville, Modoc, California; Roll: 94; Page: 5A; Enumeration District: 84, lines 27-36); FHL microfilm: 1240094.]

 

ANALYSIS:  It seems probable, based on the census records, that the father of  Zedekiah and John Street was a Virginian who migrated to North Carolina, met and married his wife there and began his family. At some point between the births of John and Zedekiah they apparently moved to Tennessee. Zedekiah, at least, seems to have moved to Madison co. AR; probably, since this nephew was born in AR, at least one brother of  Zedekiah Street was living in AR as well. The children of John Street are fully known, and it is apparent that this Richard L. Street was not among them. There is no evidence, in fact, that John Street ever lived in AR; all his children were born in TN.

 

III.  STREET FAMILIES IN TULARE CO., CA AND VICINITY:  A Street family which settled in Tulare county, CA, can be shown to be connected to the Modoc co. families. The chain of evidence is complicated, but can be outlined as follows:

A.  In Tulare co. a deed is recorded, dated 25 Dec. 1863, by which one Joseph Street transferred land to Patience Street, and to Joseph, Margaret, Lafayette, James, Rebeca, Catharine, and Thomas Street, “minor children of said Patience by her late husband Richard Street” and the “widow and children of his deceased brother.” 


B.  J. M. Guinn’s History of the State of California and Biographical Record of the San Joaquin Valley, California (1902) contains a biographical sketch of one Joseph J. Street, about whom the following information is given:

 

1.  Joseph J. Street was the son of Richard and Patience (Randolph) Street, and was born in White co. TN 6 Dec. 1846.  His family moved to AR when he was three years old.

 

2.  Joseph’s father, Richard, moved his family to California in 1860, settling finally near Visalia, Tulare co.; he died about 1863.

 

3.  Richard and Patience (Randolph) Street had three daughters and five sons “who attained mature years.”

 

Clearly this Joseph is the son of the Richard Street referred to in the 1863 deed, since the death date and place is the same, and the name of Richard’s wife is the same.

 

C.  Marriage records in Tulare co. indicate that Richard’s widow, Mrs. Patience Street, married A. J. Worthley 22 May 1864. Census records show that they had two children, Alfred L. and Marshall Worthley. Furthermore, Mary Catherine Street, daughter of Richard and Patience, married her stepbrother, Thomas W. Worthley (son of A. J. Worthley by his first wife).

 

D.  A series of records leads to the conclusion that Richard and Patience’s son referred to as Lafayette in the deed was the same person listed in the 1900 census as Zedekiah’s nephew “Richard L. Street”:

 

1.  As noted above, the 1900 census for Richard L. Street in the Modoc co. household of his uncle Zedekiah includes children Thomas, Maggie (Margaret?), Susie, and Gussie (and others); it lists Richard’s wife as Mary and says he was born in AR in July 1851.

 

2.  Richard Lafayette Street was registered to vote in Tulare co. CA in 1898, age 46, b. Arkansas.

 

2.  A Richard Lafayette Street died in Sebastopol, CA 6 Aug. 1939. His death certificate gives his birth date as 11 July 1851, indicates he was a native of AR, son of Richard and Patience (Randolph) Street, and it names his widow as Reina Street. An obituary of this man also names daughters Mrs. Maggie Cornett, Mrs. Susie Hoffman, and Mrs. Gussie Abbot, and a son C. J. Street. Based on the correspondence of names of his children, and the date and place of birth, it seems evident that this is the same Richard L. Street who appears in Modoc co. in 1900; and that his wife Mary had died (or they had divorced) and he had remarried a woman named Reina. Reina’s own death certificate (she died in Sebastopol in 1951) indicates that her maiden name was Talsma; the death certificate of C. J. Street (who died in Sebastopol in 1976) records his parents’ names as Cornelius Hornstra and Reina Talsma.

 

3.  A 1910 census listing for a Lafayett R. Street in Tulare co. in 1910 shows him as a single man, age 59 (i.e. b. ca. 1851), born in AR, living in the household of a widow, Reina Hornstra. Certainly this man is identical with the Richard L. Street discussed above; on the surface it would appear that his wife Mary died (or they had divorced) 1900/1910 and he married Reina, in whose home he was boarding in 1910; however, since we know that Mary didn’t die until 1953, there must have been a divorce here. Immediately adjacent to this household in 1910 was that of Thomas W. Worthley, the recently widowed husband of Mary Catherine (Street) Worthley, who (according to her death certificate) was the daughter of Richard and Patience (Randolph) Street and thus the sister of Richard Lafayette Street.

 

4.  A 1907 Tulare co. marriage record for one Ora Hamilton to Thomas Alford Street (b. NV ca. 1882, which corresponds to the Thomas listed as a son of Richard L. Street in the 1900 census) indicates his father was L. Street and his mother Mary Bryant. No doubt “L. Street” is “Lafayette,” the name by which Richard apparently was primarily known.

 

5.  Brief correspondence with the widow of C. J. Street of Sebastopol indicated that he was the “adopted son” of Richard L. Street. Mrs. Alice Street said that she had no further information on the Street family, but she enclosed (without explanation) two sheets of paper, seemingly rather old, on which were written in pencil a number of names and address, apparently of her husband’s relatives.  They included: Susie Hoffman, Artie Street, Margie Cornett, (Dot) Gussie Abbott, Grandpa Bryant. The recurrence of names (especially the reference to the surname Bryant) supports the inference that the Richard who died in Sebastopol was the same man who was first married Mary Bryant.

 

6.  An obituary in the Oakland Tribune for Mrs. Susie Hoffman, clearly the same woman named in the Sebastopol Richard L. Street’s obituary as his daughter, indicates that her middle name was Patience—no doubt for her grandmother.

 

ANALYSIS:  It is clear from the above facts that the Richard L. Street who was a nephew of  Zedekiah Street is the same Richard L. Street who died in Sebastopol, CA in 1939, and that he was the same man who is referred to as Lafayette Street in the 1863 deed, Richard Lafayette Street in the Tulare co. Great Register in 1898, and as Lafayett R. Street in the 1910 census of Tulare co. This establishes the fact that Zedekiah Street and Richard Street (father of Richard Lafayette Street) were brothers. This is confirmed by additional evidence:

 

E.  Census and other records pertaining to Joseph J. Street, known from the biographical sketch to be the son of Richard and Patience Street, indicate that he was married at least three times, and that he had at least one daughter who lived to maturity, Dora Street. An autograph book which belonged to Martha Ann Street, daughter of  Zedekiah Street, contains several autographs from persons in Pixley, Tulare co.; one of these is signed “your cousin, Dora Street” (dated Nov. 30. 1890).

 

F.  Two other autographs from this book (also dated in late 1890, when Martha is known to have taken an extended trip throughout California) are “your cousin M. R. Worthley” and “your cousin Maggie Worthley”; also “your friend A. L. W.”  It has already been noted that Richard Street’s widow, Patience, married A. J. Worthley and had two sons, Alfred L. and Marshall. One of Richard and Patience’s daughters, Mary Catherine, married her step-brother, Thomas Woodson Worthley, and had a daughter Margaret, b. 1879, who is likely this “Maggie Worthley.”

 

G.  It has previously been noted that Richard Street’s widow Patience, together with her children, were deeded land by Joseph Street, described as Richard’s brother.  The June, 1965 issue of Los Tulares (bulletin of the Tulare County Historical Society) has an article on the Yokohl Valley, in which two early settlers, Joe and Jim Street, are mentioned. “Neither ever married,” it states, “and they raised sheep, cattle and hogs together for several years. After some difference of opinion, Joe moved to a ranch at Milo where he died many years ago.” In a letter to this writer, the author of that article, Annie R. Mitchell, stated that she had interviewed Rev. E. R. Connelly, who had performed the funeral service for Jim Street; according to him, Jim and Joe were brothers who had a “falling out” many years before. The death certificates for both brothers have been inspected; no information about their parentage is given, but it might be noted that the informant on James Street’s certificate was one T. W. Street—very likely Thomas Wright Street, a son of Richard and Patience Street, and thus presumably James Street’s nephew. The death certificates also give no information as to birthplace or date of birth. Joseph, who died in 1910, is said to have been “76 years and 10 months” of age; James, who died in 1919, is said to have been born in 1841. Both these men were listed on the Great Register for Tulare co. in 1867, and there it indicates that Joseph Street, age 34, was born in TN, and James Monroe Street, age 27, was born in TN. Both also appear in the 1900 census, where Joseph is said to have been born in May 1833, and James in Sept. 1842 (though various other records suggest a slightly earlier birth date for him; probably the Great Register which suggests a birth date of 1839/40 is most trustworthy, since he himself would have given that information when he registered). In both cases, the census indicates their father was born in Virginia, their mother in North Carolina—consistent with the pattern shown in the census for both  Zedekiah and John Street.

 

ANALYSIS:  This rather complicated argument can be summarized as follows: (1) The various records pertaining to Richard Lafayette Street and his family demonstrate that Zedekiah Street was a brother of the Richard Street who died in Tulare co. in 1863. (2)  The Tulare co. deed proves that Joseph Street was also a brother of Richard Street. (3) The Tulare co. historical information indicates that James Monroe Street was a brother of Joseph Street, and this is confirmed by the fact that the informant on James’ death certificate was apparently a son of Joseph’s Street’s brother Richard. When this information is collated, it suggests a Street family with at least the following members:

 

i.  Richard Street, b. NC (?) ca. 1814/15, mar. Patience Randolph.

 

ii.  John Street, b. NC 12 Jan. 1816, mar. Martha Ann Robinson/Roberson.

 

iii.   Zedekiah Street, b. TN 11 Dec. 1828, mar. Caroline Hash.

 

iv.  Joseph Street, b. ca. May 1833, never married.

 

v.  James Monroe Street, b. TN ca. Sept. 1839, never married.

 

Furthermore, census records for four of these brothers (excluding Richard, who died too early for the censuses which asked for this information) consistently indicate that their father was born in Virginia, their mother in North Carolina; and the birthplaces of the sons would suggest that a migration from North Carolina to Tennessee took place some time between 1816 and 1828. Both Richard and  Zedekiah have been connected to Arkansas, the latter specifically to Madison co.

 

IV.  MADISON COUNTY, ARKANSAS. Records in early Madison co. AR are sparse, but they prove the presence of this Street family in the 1850s. Richard Street supposedly moved to AR when his son Joseph was three (he was b. Dec. 1846), but he does not appear there in the 1850 census of that state, so apparently had not yet arrived in time for the census taker. Both Richard and  Zedekiah left AR about 1860, and thus do not appear there in the census of that year (neither have they been found in California; the census seems to have missed them, perhaps because they were en route at the time it was taken).Yet there are relevent Madison co. records:

A.  Tax records exist for Madison co., and they show the following Street entries: Richard appears first in 1852; and Richard, Jo[seph] and Tom in 1853. According to a Madison county researcher, the listing for a particular year would indicate that the individual incurred tax liability in the county the previous fall. In the 1853 listing, the three are consecutive, which usually indicates that they went to the courthouse together to be assessed. In 1853, Joseph is not assessed a poll tax; this indicates that was 55 years of age or older, and thus exempt (so he obviously could not be the Joseph who appears in Tulare co., whom we have demonstrated is the brother of Zedekiah, Richard, James  and John).  The same three names appear in 1854; in 1855 and 1856, Richard does not appear, but the others do, as does William Street. Subsequent years are not available on microfilm and have not been inspected.

B.  Madison County Musings, the publication of the Madison County Genealogical Society, published a list of cemetery inscriptions from the Lower Camp Ground Cemetery in Madison county (VI:2, p. 81). Included in this listing are two Street graves, Margaret Street (b. 15 Oct. 1792, d. 11 Nov. 1854) and Thomas Street (b. 25 July 1827, d. 19 Feb. 1859).

C.  Goodspeed’s history of Madison co. lists early landowners, including Joseph Street in 1852, Township 17 Range 24 (SE SE Section 30). I have not tried to find the original document.

D.  There is a deed recorded in Deed Book E, page 101 [Source: FHL film 007899273, image 636]: “Know all men by these presents that I, Joseph Street senr. of the state of Arkansas county of Madison in considertion of the sum of six hundred dollars to me paid by Joseph Street Junr. in good and lawful money the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, I do hereby give, grant, transfer, sell and convey unto the said Joseph Street Jr., his heirs and assigns, a certain tract and parcel of land situate in the state and county above mentioned bounded and described as follows, viz. the SE quarter of the SE quarter of section no. 30 and the northeast quarter of the NE of section no. thirty-one in township no. 17 north of range twenty four containing eighty acres more or less with all the [?] and appurtenances […] to have and to hold the aforementioned premises that […] Street  his heirs and assigns [..] that I am […] full of the afoesaid premises that they are free from […]that I havea good right to sell and convey […] Joseph Street Jr. his heirs and assigns forever […] claims and demands of all and every person whom […] my seal this 9th day of January AD 1860. Joseph Street  Witness: P. W. Newton, J.R. Berry” 

E.  A federal land patent for Joseph Street Junior was registered in Madison co. for 40 acres in Section 29, Township 17N, Range 24W, dated Feb. 1, 1860. This is a bit puzzling, since Joseph has not been located in the 1860 census; but perhaps the land was quickly sold and Joseph left the county (or perhaps the census taker missed him; or perhaps he is in the 1860 census, but I’ve not found him!).

F. Joseph Street Junior sells the same parcel he bought from his father, along with another parcel, on 10 Apr 1860 to Jacob Owens and Drury? Wall for $700 [Source: FHL film 007899273, image 658]

ANALYSIS:  The connection of the California Street families to Madison co. AR is based on the newspaper notice of  Zedekiah’s marriage, which states he was “from Madison co. AR.”  This is supported by the appearance in Madison co. tax records of Richard Street, just at the time when the Tulare co. Richard Street is said to have located in Arkansas. If the hypothesis that these Street listings in AR are in fact the California family is correct, the following observations can be made: Joseph Street was significantly older than Richard Street (b. 1797 or earlier, compared to Richard’s 1814 birth date) and is quite possibly the father of the five known Street brothers. The Margaret Street buried in Madison co. is of the correct age to be the mother of these boys; and the Thomas Street buried there is the correct age to be a brother, who would fit between  Zedekiah and Joseph among the children of Joseph and Margaret. William Street appears first on the tax list in 1855; often this suggests that a man has turned 21. If that is the case here, William would be born ca. 1833/34 and could be another brother between Joseph and James.

 

V.  TENNESSEE RECORDS.  While all the evidence has pointed to the Street family coming from Tennessee (via AR), the only tie to a specific place in TN has so far been statements in records of the children of John Street that they were born in Putnam co. TN.  Putnam co. was formed in 1854 from portions of White, Jackson, Overton and Dekalb counties, all located in central TN.  A search of records in those counties reveals the following:

A.  Richard Street married Patience Randolph in White co. TN 25 Feb. 1846.  Certainly this is the Richard who later moved to Tulare co. CA. In the same county is the marriage record of John Street and Martha Robison 15 Apr. 1852, undoubtedly the John who settled in Modoc co. CA.  The fact that these two brothers married in White co. suggests very strongly that this is the county in which their parents were living around 1850.

B.  The 1850 census of White co. shows the following listing:

Richard Street             34             b. NC

Patience                      25             b. TN

Joseph                         4             b. TN

Chisum                        3              b. TN

Margarett                  10/12           b. TN

[Source: Year: 1850; Census Place: District 11, White county, TN; Roll: 900; Page: 103B] (It might be noted that adjacent to this family is the household of John Robinson, including a daughter Martha Ann Robinson, 18 years old—just the right age to be the Martha Ann Robinson/Roberson who married John Street of Modoc co.) 

C.  A few pages away, still in White co., in 1850, we find the following family:

Joseph Street               68        b. VA

Margaret                     55        b. NC

John                            33        b. NC

Hannah                        24        b. TN

Zachariah                    21        b. TN

Thomas                       20        b. TN

Joseph                         19        b. TN

William                       15        b. TN

James M.                     12        b. TN

[Source: Year: 1850; Census Place: District 11, White county, TN; Roll: 900; Page: 99B]

D.  Joseph Street, with a consistent family configuration, is also found in the 1840 census of White co. and the 1830 census of adjacent Warren co. TN. These earlier records suggest an older daughter b. ca. 1815/20. White co. marriage records show a Frances Street who married Jonas Deitz in 1840; she is likely this daughter, since there doesn’t appear to be any other Street family in White co. at this time.

ANALYSIS:  We had previously concluded that Richard, John, Zedekiah, Joseph and James M. Street were all brothers, who had lived in TN, possibly the area that later became Putnam co. (which would have included White co. in 1850). The Madison co. AR records suggested possible additional brothers William and Thomas, and our hypothesis was that the Joseph Street there may have been their father, the Margaret Street their mother. Here, in this 1850 census record, we have a listing that includes all these names except Richard (but there is a corresponding Richard Street nearby, married and in his own household) and Zedekiah (but Zachariah could easily be a census taker’s error). This census record strongly supports our hypothesis. The Margaret Street here was born ca. 1794/95—close enough to the 1792 date shown in the Madison co. cemetery, given the margin of error on census records; the Thomas Street here was born ca. 1829/30, again quite close to the Thomas buried in Lower Campground Cemetery in Madison county.  The brother William here is shown as b. 1834/35, exactly what we suggested for the William who apparently turns 21 in 1855 in Madison co. The dates for John and Zachariah/Zedekiah also match closely the known dates for those brothers. While this evidence is circumstantial, it must be regarded as convincing that this is, in fact, the same family that appears both in Madison co. AR and in California.

 

VI. OTHER STREET SIBLINGS. Given the list of children of Joseph and Margaret (Carmichael) Street in the 1850 census (as well as the listing, though without names, in the 1840 census), can we identify some of these additional siblings?

A.  We previously noted that there was a Frances Street who married Jonas Deitz in White co. NC in 1840, and speculated that she might be the older daughter who appears in          1830 census record of Joseph and Margaret Street. Attempting to follow this family        leads to some interesting other information. Jones Deats appears in the 1860 census of Collin co. TX, with wife Frances and four daughters, the oldest of whom is Margaret. [Precinct 1, page 33] Frances was born in NC, the older two daughters (Margaret, 16, and Ann, 12) in Tenn., and the younger two (Mary E., 8, and Rebecca M., 4) in Arkansas. This suggests that this couple was married in Tennessee, migrated to Arkansas in the early 1850s, and to Texas after 1856. The migration pattern from Tennessee to Arkansas matches that of the Streets. In the same 1860 census, in Lamar co. TX, is one Logan Dietz, age 19, wife Mary C., age 17. Dietz family genealogists say that this is the oldest son of Jonas and Frances (Street) Dietz, whose full name was Richard Logan Dietz. He had apparently recently married and moved to Lamar co.

ANALYSIS: Again this is circumstantial evidence, but it appears very likely that Frances Dietz is the daughter of Joseph and Margaret Street, and thus the sister of Zedekiah Street and the other Street brothers who migrated to California. This is confirmed by DNA matches on ancestry.com of several descendants of this couple with descendants of Zedekiah, John, and William Street.

B.  Hannah Street. There is a Hannah Street who married William Bailey Gilliland. The specifics here are a little unclear. A number of sites, including findagrave.com, state that their marriage date was 25 Jul 1858, but I’ve not found a marriage record for them. Gilliland’s first wife, Sarah (Proctor), died in Madison co. AR 25 Mar 1857 and is buried in Huntsville Cemetary. W. B. and Hannah’s first known child was born ca 1859, reportedly in Texas; but the couple has not been located in either the 1860 or 1870 census. They appear in the 1880 census in Wise co. TX; Hannah died in Parker county TX in 1882 (Wise and Parker are adjacent).  Her tombstone gives her birth year as 1822, slightly older than the 1850 census in White co. TN., but pretty close; and the 1880 census indicates she was born in Tennessee. It seems quite possible that the marriage took place in Madison co. AR soon after the death of Sarah, and if that is correct, it seems probable that the Hannah Street is the daughter of Joseph and Margaret; no other Street families are known to be living in Madison county at that time. This family is complicated to trace; there were numerous intermarriages with Gillilands; two of W. B. and Hannah’s daughters, for instance, married sons of one Benson Gilliland (presumably some degree of cousins).

ANALYSIS: It seems very possible that the Hannah Street who married William Bailey Gilliland also belong to this family, though further research needs to be done to confirm.

C.  William Street presents some interesting problems. In Lamar co. TX in 1860, adjacent to Logan Dietz, is one William Street, age 27, born in Tennessee, with wife Sarah J., 24, also born in Tennessee, and an infant (one month old) Mary E., born in Texas. This same William and Sarah are recorded in Polk twp., Dade co. MO in 1870, with daughter Mary and two more daughters, Margaret, 8, and Amanda J., 4. One might think that this is the William who appears in the household of Joseph and Margaret in 1850. This couple is apparently the William M. Street (1832-1895) and Sarah Jane (Gray) Street (1834-1891) who are buried in Viney Creek Cemetery, Barry co. MO. Logan Dietz had married a sister of Sarah Jane (Gray) Street, Mary Caroline Gray, both of these women daughters of Benjamin F. and Mary (Williams) Gray. The close connection between these two adjacent families (husbands being uncle and nephew, wives being sisters) makes it very likely that this William is another son of Joseph and Margaret (Carmichael) Street. As stated previously, descendants of this couple show DNA matches with descendants of both John and Zedekiah Street.

1.     This William Street who married Sarah Jane Gray appears in Lamar co. TX in 1860, Dade co. MO in 1870, McDonald co MO in 1880, and then apparently dies in Barry co. MO. His gravestone in the Viney Creek Cemetery there gives his birth date as 28 July 1832, death date as 15 Apr. 1895; his wife Sarah b. 24 May 1834, d. 24 Dec. 1891.

2.     We must note that there is, however, another enigmatic William Street who appears in Fresno co. CA in 1860, as follows:

 

Fresno co. Second Twp. 1860  PO Millerton

1044/1052

William Street            39        m         Trader             Ark

Jean                             36        f           HK                  Ark

Richard                       14        m                                 Ark.

Chistholm                   13        m                                

Margaret                     12        f                                  

Lafayette                     10        m                                

Kate                            6          f                                  

Emma                          4          f                                  

Elizabeth                     3          f                                            

Thomas                       2          m                                  

The children in this household very closely mirror the children of Richard and Patience (Randolph) Street. Richard and Patience have not been located in the 1860 census, which might suggest that they were “en route” to California at that time and were missed by the census taker. But it is hard to believe that the children in this Fresno co. household are not theirs. Compare the families: 

1850 Richard & Patience                    1860 William & Jean              1870 census

White co. TN                                      Fresno co. CA

                                                           

                                                            Richard b. ca. 1846                

Joseph b. ca. 1846                                                                               Joseph b. ca. 1847

Chisam b. ca. 1847                             Chistholm b. ca. 1847

Margarett b. ca. 1849                          Margaret b. ca. 1848               Margaret b. ca. 1848

                                                            Lafayette b. ca. 1850              Lafayette b. ca. 1850

                                                            Kate b. ca. 1854                      Catherine b. 1856

                                                            Emma b. ca. 1856

                                                            Elizabeth b. ca. 1857

                                                            Thomas b. ca. 1858                 Thomas b. ca. 1860

 

ANALYSIS: This Fresno county William’s age is considerably off what we would expect if he were the son of Joseph and Margaret; the Madison co. tax lists suggested a birth date of ca. 1833/34, while the 1850 census suggested ca. 1834/35; but this census record indicates a birth date of ca. 1821. Yet five of the children in this 1860 household correspond in name and date with the known children of Richard and Patience Street—and two of those names are quite unusual, Chisholm and Lafayette. It seems almost inconceivable that this is just a strange coincidence. But it raises all kinds of questions and problems. First, why are these children not with their parents? And who is this couple they are with? Furthermore, if these are Richard and Patience’s children, where are the rest of them? Joseph was old enough perhaps to be on his own, or perhaps the “Richard” here is in fact Joseph, a census-taker’s error? And who are these two girls, Emma and Elizabeth—perhaps children of William and Jean? Or is it possible that the census taker somehow screwed up the parents’ names, and that this is in fact Richard and Patience? In that case, would Emma and Elizabeth be two daughters who both died prior to the 1870 census? Or is one of them really Rebecca, Richard’s daughter b. 1858? I have not found any evidence of this “William Street” or his family after the 1860 census. While conceivably the “Jean” listed her as wife of William could be the Lamar co. William’s wife Sarah Jane, there is no evidence that this couple ever sojourned in California, and they are definitely listed in the 1860 census in Lamar co. TX with an infant daughter, so it seems very unlikely that they had come to California at this time. I’m inclined to think that the best way to understand this census record is that it is just seriously wrong.

This leaves us now with the following presumed family of Joseph and Margaret (Carmichael) Street:

i.  Richard Street, b. NC (?) ca. 1814/15, mar. Patience Randolph; d. Tulare co. CA ca. 1862

 

ii.  John Street, b. NC 12 Jan. 1816, mar. Martha Ann Robinson/Roberson; d. Cedarville, Modoc co. CA 1 Aug 1883.

 

iii.  Frances “Fanny” Street, b. NC ca. 1820, mar. Jonas A. Dietz; last known to be living in Red River co. TX 1870.

 

iv.  Hannah Street, b. TN ca. 1822/25; perhaps married William Bailey Gilliland, eventually settled in Wise and/or Parker co. TX.

 

v.  Thomas Street, b. TN 25 Jul 1827, d. Madison co. AR 19 Feb 1859, apparently unmarried


vi.   Zedekiah Street, b. TN 11 Dec. 1828, mar. Caroline Hash; d. Cedarville, Modoc co. CA 17 Apr 1906.

 

vii.  Joseph Street, b. TN ca. May 1833, d. Tulare co. CA 19 Mar 1910, never married.

 

viii.  William M. Street, b. TN 28 Jul 1832, m. Sarah Jane Gray; d. Barry co. MO 15 Apr. 1895.

 

ix.  James Monroe Street, b. TN ca. Sept. 1839, d. Visalia, Tulare co. CA 27 Apr 1919; never married.

 

VI.  NORTH CAROLINA RECORDS.  We have ascertained that the two oldest children of this family, Richard, John and Frances, were born in North Carolina, so we would expect to find a Joseph Street with this family configuration in that state in the census of 1820 (and perhaps that of 1810). A search reveals:

A.  The only Joseph Street listed as head of a household in the 1820 census of North Carolina is found in Orange co.; he is not listed there in 1830. The 1820 listing shows Joseph and his wife both aged 26-45 (i.e., born 1775-94) with two sons and a daughter under five years of age. This is exactly consistent with the family of the White co. Joseph and Margaret Street.

B.  Orange co. NC marriage records reveal the marriage of Joseph Street and Peggy Carmichael on 26 Sept. 1813. “Peggy,” of course, is a common nickname for Margaret.  Since the eldest son of our Joseph and Margaret Street was born ca. 1814/15, this 1813 marriage is just what we would expect for them.

C.  An Orange co. NC will, written in 1816 and proved in 1819, for Thomas Carmichael names his wife Mary, sons Archibald and John Henry Carmichael, and daughters Margaret Street, Jane Isely, and Nancy Smith.

D.  The 1820 census noted above lists, on the same page as Joseph Street, one John H. Comical. The 1840 census for White co. TN lists, on the same page as Joseph Street, John H. Commichel. Obviously the family of this Joseph Street has a continuing close geographical connection with this John Carmichael (in various spellings), supporting the idea that Joseph’s wife was the sister of John H. Carmichael.

 E.  Correspondence with a Carmichael genealogist, the late Dr. Louis Johnson Jr., indicates that John H. Carmichael later moved to California, settling and later dying in Sonoma co. CA. It is known that John Street, when he came to California in 1870, settled briefly in Sonoma co. before moving on to Modoc co. In the 1870 census, he and his entire family appear in the household of his presumed uncle John H. Carmichael (John’s son, Archibald, is listed as head of household). John also appears on the Great Register there in Sept. 1871). One of John H. Carmichael’s daughters, Mary Ann, married a William C. Johnson and settled in Tulare co. CA, the same county as several of the Street family. This close association of the family of John Street with the family of John H. Carmichael strongly confirms the close association, probably familial, of these two families.

F.  The 1810 census of Orange co. NC is difficult to read; no Joseph Street was found, but there is a John Street, Esq. and an R. Street (who apparently has at least two other adult males living in his household, possibly brothers).

ANALYSIS:  It seems likely that Joseph and Margaret “Peggy” (Carmichael) Street of Orange co. NC are the same Joseph and Margaret Street that later appear in White co. TN and Madison co. AR. The strongest piece of evidence here is the continued association with the Carmichael family in NC, TN, and possibly in CA. This is supported by consistent family configurations shown through the various censuses.

VII.  THE STREET GENEALOGY.  While a secondary source must always be treated with great caution, it is useful to note some information in The Street Genealogy by Mrs. Mary A. Street (1895). This book includes a section on a Street family of New Kent and Hanover cos. VA, descendants of John and Hannah (Waddy) Street. According to this book, this John Street had a son Joseph, b. 17 Dec. 1737, who after the Revolution “went to North Carolina and m. SALLIE TATE; afterward removed to Tennessee. He was living when Gen. Jackson was elected president. . . Mr. Street lived to be 98 years old, and his wife to be 96. Both d. in Tennessee.”  This genealogy goes on to list their children as follows:

1.  John Tate Street.

2.  Richard Street (“m.; no issue”).

3.  Joseph Montfort Street (“m., and in his old age emigrated to Oregon”).

4.  William Street (“m. and moved to Williamson co., Tenn., then to Robertson co., Tenn., and d. there”).

5.  Frances, m. Alexander Vincent (“moved to Williamson co., Tenn., and d. there”)

6.  Sarah, m. Charley Shanks (“moved to Williamson co., Tenn., thence to Bedford co., d. and left a family”).

7.  Mary, m. Mr Brackin (“never left North Carolina”)

8.  Hannah, m. (1) Mr. Tate; (2) Mr. Waggoner (“moved to Williamson co., Tenn; had two children”).

This information is cited because much of it can be confirmed by census records showing a very similar migration pattern as that of our Joseph Street; this leads to the suggestion that our Joseph who married Margaret Carmichael may well be the son of Joseph and Sarah (Tate) Street described in this book. For example, the 1820 census of Orange co. NC in which we found a Joseph Street believed to be “our” Joseph also includes Alexander Vincent, an Isaac Brackin, and Volluntine [Valentine] Waggoner. Orange county marriage records, in addition to the one for Joseph Street and Peggy Carmichael, include Isaac Brackin and Susannah Street (bondsman Charlie Shanks), Richard Street and Elizabeth Liner, William Street and Nelly Shaw, Uriah Tate and Hannah Street (bondsman Joseph Street), Zephaniah Tate and Hannah Tate (bondsman William Street), and Valentine Waggoner and Hannah Tate. These families all turn up later in the various central Tennessee counties named in the Street genealogy: John Tate Street in Bedford co. in 1830; Richard Street in Bedford co. in 1830 (with a man and woman in his household in their 90’s and 80’s respectively, probably his elderly parents Joseph and Sarah) and in Marshall co. in 1840; William Street in Williamson co. in 1830, then in Robertson co. in 1840-60; Frances and Alexander Vincent in Bedford co. in 1830, then Williamson co. in 1840-50; Charles and Sarah Shanks in Bedford co. in 1830; Hannah and Valentine Waggoner in Williamson co. 1830-60 (and buried in a family cemetery in Nolensville, TN). It might also be noted that in the Tate family of which Sarah (Tate) Street was a part, the name “Zedekiah” appears a number of times; and the William Street who appears in Williamson co. TN had a son named Zedekiah. While not conclusive, this certainly points to our Joseph Street who married Margaret Carmichael and had a son Zedekiah being part of this family as well.

ANALYSIS:  While positive proof is lacking, it seems a good working hypothesis to assume that our Joseph Street was the son of Joseph and Sarah/Sallie (Tate) Street. Mrs. Street’s reference to this Joseph as “Joseph Montfort Street,” however, must be treated with skepticism. There was a man name Joseph Montfort Street who was a frontier military man of some prominence, and seems to have been a cousin of this line of Streets; it seems more likely that Mrs. Street has conflated the two. The genuine Joseph Montfort Street was descended from the Montfort family of Virginia (hence the name), but our Joseph’s line was not; and Joseph Montfort Street the military man was a contemporary of this Joseph, so it is not likely that the one was named for the other. It should also be noted that Mrs. Street has this Joseph going to Oregon “in his old age.” This is possible, though no record of him has been found there. He is last known with certainty to be in Madison co. AR in early 1860. Since most of his children migrated west about that time, the possibility of his doing so cannot be dismissed.

 

Richard O. Johnson

307 Marina View Lane

Webster, NY 14580

e-mail: roj@nccn.net

 

Revised 2 March 2022

 


Friday, February 4, 2022

More on Ragsdale connection

I posted some of this four years ago, but I've found some new information, so here's a new take on it: 

In Crawford county AR censuses between 1850 and 1870 appears George W. Ragsdale. This is an attempt to analyze records related to this man, and to argue that he was married at least three times and had at least six children by these three wives. First some notes from a couple of secondary sources. History of Benton, Washington, Carroll, Madison, Crawford, Franklin, and Sebastian Counties, Arkansas (Chicago: Goodspeed Publishing Co., 1889) contains a biographical sketch of one Wesley Hinson [Henson] of Crawford county. Among other things, the sketch states: “In December, 1866, he married Johanna, daughter of George and Hester Ann Ragsdale, who came here with her parents in an early day. She lost her mother when but a girl, but her father is now living in Washington County.” The name of Henson’s wife is subject to some variation; in his own will, recorded in Crawford co., he refers to her as “John Anna Caroline Henson” [Vol. A, pp. 222-223]. Various census and other records sometimes refer to her as Johanna or as some variation of John Anna.

I have now located the death certificate of this woman. She died in Crawford co. AR 25 Dec 1936, her name given as Joe Anna Henson, widow of Wesley Henson, b. AR 26 May 1845, age 91. Unfortunately, the names of her parents are not given, nor is the name of the informant. 

A query posted by a Mrs. J. R. Bush in the Apr./May/June 1969 issue of The Arkansas Family Historian [7.2, p. 68] stated that George Ragsdale was the son of Peter and Matilda Ragsdale, was born in 1822 in Mississippi and “was a widower in 1860 census of Crawford Co., with two sons, Peter, 5, and Enos, 3.” She also indicated that other children of Peter Ragsdale included James (m. Patsy Benton and Mary Hale or Hail; he and his first wife appear in the 1850 census of Franklin co. AR two households away from Elizabeth Elliott), Sarah (m. Dosier Fussell), and Susan, m. Luna Booth. She also indicated that the Ragsdale family lived at different times in TN, AL, MS and MO before coming to Crawford co. AR in 1837. 

George appears first by name in the 1850 census in Crawford county, living in the Bates twp. household of his brother-in-law and sister, Luna and Susan Booth). His mother Matilda is also in the household. This record gives his age as 28 (i.e., b. 1821-22). No wife or children are listed here. However, in neighboring Franklin county there appears Elizabeth Elliott, age 49, with a 16-year-old female Frances J. Elliott (known to be her daughter), two younger children (Frances and William J. Wright, otherwise unknown), and Johnana Ragsdale. The census gives Johnana’s age as 55, born in Arkansas—problematic since that would place her birth in Arkansas long before there were white settlers there. I believe the age is also incorrect, and that she was in fact 5; this is supported by the 1860 census, where Elizabeth Elliott’s household (her name spelled “Ellet”) includes J. A. Ragsdale, female, age 14, b. AR. 

My interpretation here—admittedly conjectural, but I believe it is the best way to understand these records—is that George Ragsdale married Hester Ann Elliott, that they had a daughter, John Anna/Johanna, ca. 1845, that Hester Ann then died and the young daughter was raised by her maternal grandmother Elizabeth Elliott; her father lived nearby with his sister and her family. While there is no definitive evidence that Hester Ann was a daughter of Elizabeth Elliott, there is circumstantial evidence supporting this interpretation: 

 (1) Elizabeth Elliott’s 1840 household includes an otherwise unknown female the correct age to have married and born a child in the mid 1840s. 

(2) Elizabeth Elliott had a son, W. T. C. Elliott, who moved to California and named his own daughter Hester. 

(3) Elizabeth’s daughter Frances Jane married John Johnson (they were living adjacent to her in 1860); their son, Columbus, left family information indicating that his father had a sister Mrs. Raglyn. His notes, while generally correct, conflate the known relatives of his parents somewhat, and there is no known “Ragyln” in John Johnson’s fairly well-established family; my guess is that he has misremembered the name (he was only a child when his parents died and he left Arkansas) and confused how this woman was related to him. This would explain why he did not know this aunt’s first name (since she died before he was born) but would remember (if imprecisely) the last name (since his aunt’s daughter was being raised by their mutual grandmother and they lived next door). 

George next appears in 1860 in Lafayette twp., Crawford co., without a wife but with (apparently) two young sons, Peter and Enos. Some Ragsdale researchers have concluded that these boys are also children of Hester Ann (probably based simply on the biographical sketch which mentions John Anna/Johanna). This seems quite unlikely, since it appears that Hester had died at least six years prior to the birth of Peter. There are no extant Crawford county marriage records for this period, but it appears that these boys’ mother was not Hester Ann, and that their mother is otherwise unnamed. I have not located death certificates or other records for either which would give their mother's name.

George appears in 1870, still in Lafayette twp., as G. W. Ragsdale, with a wife N. C. (who is only 19, while his age is given as 48!). His younger son Enos (E. B.) is still in his household, and there is a one-year-old girl, M. A., apparently the daughter of this new young wife. One might wonder if perhaps N. C. could be a daughter-in-law; but Enos was only 13 at this point, and Peter only 15. Furthermore, the 1880 census of Washington co. AR shows George Ragsdale (recall that the biographical sketch cited earlier implies that George now lives in Washington co.) with wife Nancy, and children Martha, George, and Maggie. I have not located death certificates or other records giving the name of the mother of any of these children.

George then appears in the 1895 census of Cherokee co. KS, in the household of P. Ragsdale (apparently his son by the second wife) and his family. I have found no further record after this. Some Ragsdale researchers have believed that he is the George W. Ragsdale who died in Pope co. AR in 1932, apparently simply noting his name in the death index for Arkansas. The death certificate itself, however, indicates that this George W. Ragsdale was born in 1848, so can hardly be the Crawford county George Ragsdale. There is a George W. Ragsdale who married Amanda Ladd who seems to have lived quite consistently in Pope county during the time when “our” George clearly lived elsewhere. 

To summarize: I believe that this George W. Ragsdale married three times: (1) to Hester Ann Elliott, ca. 1845, by whom he had one daughter, John Anna/Johanna Caroline, b. ca. 1846, with Hester dying not long after ; (2) to an unknown woman ca. 1853, by whom he had Peter (b. ca. 1855) and Enos (b. 1857), with the wife dying prior to 1860; (3) to Nancy ----, many years his junior, ca. 1867, by whom he had Martha (b. ca. 1869), George (b. ca. 1871), and Maggie (b. ca. 1878). George later (ca. 1890) moved to Kansas; there is no further record of him after 1895.

Wednesday, January 19, 2022

Mysterious Tilda Nelson

Tilda Nelson


In the 1885 Nebraska state census of Burt county, the household of my great-grandfather, August Anderson, there appears a nine-year-old girl, Tilda Nelson, whom the census records as August’s “nephew” (presumably actually “niece”). Minnie Cunanan, one of August’s daughters, told me in a 1974 interview: “Dad’s mother’s sister came to this country and had two children. Or was it three? Anyway, she decided she couldn’t take care of them, so she gave them away. And the oldest girl, Tilda, was then, oh, twelve, thirteen years old. And Dad said no, he didn’t want her given away, he’d take Tilda. So Tilda stayed at home until they left Nebraska. I used to write to her. She wrote, but pretty soon I didn’t get any answer. Tilda Nilsson was her name before she was married. I don’t remember what her married name was.”

August Anderson’s mother was Sara Maria Persdotter. Swedish parish records show that she was one of at least eight children. One brother was Franz Otto, known in America as Otto Peterson; the sister to whom Minnie referred was Johanna Charlotta Persdotter, b. in Ulrika, Östergötland, Sweden 4 Mar 1841. Swedish records indicate that she was married to Nils Gustaf Svensson in Ulrika 27 Dec 1867, and that they had at least five children: Anders Petter Oskar Nilsson (b. 31 Jul 1868), a stillborn daughter (25 Nov. 1871), Tilda Karolina (b. 22 Aug. 1876), Carl Axel Emil (b. 18 Feb 1880), and Sofia Kristina (b. 23 Oct 1882). These children were all born in Malexander, Östergötland, Sweden. Nils Svensson died 21 Jan 1883; apparently his widow came to the United States some time not long thereafter. She has not been located in the 1885 Nebraska state census.

The question is: what became of Johanna, her daughter Tilda, and the one or two other children that Minnie remembered?

The brother of Johanna and Sara, Otto Peterson, died in Cuming co. NE 8 Jan 1916. In his obituary in Oakland Independent (21 Jan 1916), he is said to be survived (besides his wife and children) by sister, Mrs. Hannah Nelson, of DeKalb, Illinois. In the DeKalb Daily Chronicle there appears, on 1 Feb 1919, an obituary for Mrs. Hannah Nelson. It says that the “nearly 78” year old woman “spent her early life in Sweden, being born there in 1841. She was married at her home in the foreign country, her husband having passed away a few years after her marriage. A few years later she came to this country and for the last 15 years has made her home here with her daughter [Mrs. William Murray].” The obituary indicates that she died “last night”—i.e., 31 January 1919.

The DeKalb county death certificate for Johanna Nelson, on the other hand, indicates that she died 4 Feb. 1919—clearly (and oddly) wrong, since her obituary had appeared three days earlier. It gives her birthdate as 4 Mar 1844—again apparently not correct, since the Swedish records indicate 1841. However, it should be noted that the informant on the death certificate is William Murray, her son-in-law, who may simply not have known accurately her date of birth. Her father’s name is not listed, but her mother’s maiden name is listed as “A. Anderson”—again, incorrect, though Anderson was her married name. But both of Johanna’s parents died many years before Murray married Johanna, and he likely never knew them. 

Johanna’s obituary lists her survivors as her daughters, Mrs. William Murray of DeKalb, and Mrs. Althea Geisler of Nebraska, and a son, F. E. Nelson of Macon, Missouri. Mrs. William Murray seems clearly to be the “Tilda Nelson” who lived with the August Anderson family. Her obituary in the DeKalb Daily Chronicle 14 Oct. 1957 states that she was born in Linkoping, Sweden 22 Aug. 1876, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Nels Swensen. The date and parents’ names are a match; she was actually born in Malexander parish, but Linkoping is the closest city of any size. The obituary names her children, as well as a sister, Mrs. Althea Geistler [sic] of Nebraska.

This Althea Geisler is apparently the Sofia Kristina listed in the Swedish records as the youngest daughter of Nils and Johanna. She was born in 1882, shortly before her father’s death, and so was just an infant when her mother brought her to the United States. Her obituary in the Fremont (Nebraska) Tribune appeared 10 Oct. 1966. It states that “she was born Oct. 23, 1882 in Sweden but came to live in the Oakland vicinity one year after birth.” In the 1885 Nebraska state census, there is an Althea Nelson listed as a daughter in the household of John N. and Ingrid Nelson; she is three years old (i.e., b. ca. 1882). In the Social Security Applications and Claims Index, her name is given as Althea Nel[son?] Geistler, and her parents are listed as Nels Nelson and Johanna Peterson—again, not quite right (her father was Nils Svensson), but an understandable confusion if the family all went by Nelson in America. In the 1900 census of DeKalb county IL, there is an Althea S. K. Hubbill, age 17, b. Oct. 1882 in Sweden, listed as the daughter of Lusina C. [?] Hubbill (b. 1820 in New York). This Althea Hubbill married Wallace Geisler in DeKalb county 6 Mar 1901 (according to Geisler’s obituary). The Geislers appear in the 1910 census of DeKalb county, and Lucina C. Hubil is in their household, age 88, listed as “mother-in-law” of Wallace. Note the initials in the 1900 census—S. K. for Sofia Kristina? Was Sofia “adopted” by another family and given the name “Althea”? Were the John and Ingrid Nelson in 1885 related in some way to this family? Who were the Hubbills? (Lucina Hubbell [sic] died 27 Apr 1910 “at the home of her daughter” in DeKalb, according to her obituary.)

Who is the F. E. Nelson, named as a son of Johanna in her obituary? I have not been able to find him in Macon MO or elsewhere. The two known sons of Johanna and Nils are Anders Petter Oskar, b. 1868, and Carl Axel Emil, b. 1880; but how do either of those names translate to “F. E.”? Or did they have another son who has not been found in the Swedish records? There is an F. E. Nelson in DeKalb co. IL in the 1910 census, just two households away from the Geislers. He is 30 years old, born in Sweden—so could conceivably be the son born Carl Axel Emil. In his household is his mother Anna, age 70—could she be an “adoptive” mother, or could that actually be Johanna? 

Why was Johanna known as Johanna Nelson? The only explanation that occurs to me is that, since her children were surnamed Nelson (because their father was Nils), it was just simpler for her to take that name as well—but why would that be important if she had “given them away”? Or is it possible that she married again in America to a Nelson (though no such marriage is hinted at in her obituary)?








 

Sunday, May 17, 2020

Has DNA solved a mystery?

Perhaps my biggest brick wall has been the paternity of my great-grandfather (Gustaf), who was brought to America from Sweden as a ten-year-old by his maternal grandparents. The family story (which I always found a tad clichéd) was that his mother became pregnant by the “son of the landowner,” and as Gustaf grew he so resembled his biological father that the paternal grandfather paid the maternal grandparents to take the boy to America. I’ve searched Swedish records trying to find some clue about his biological father, but to no avail.

Recently I was perusing my ancestry.com DNA matches, and I came upon a man (identified in the “third cousin” range) who had only a minimal tree posted. But in looking more closely, I discovered that his grandfather came from the same small parish in Sweden as my great-grandfather.  No one else in his tree came from that area, or from any area where my family lived. His grandfather (Johan) was born a year or two before my great-grandfather, so cannot be my direct ancestor, but of course Johan’s father (Carl) could be. I then searched for other DNA matches to me who might also be related to Johan and Carl, and I found three or four who are also descended from Carl through various of his in-wedlock children.

I then went looking in the Swedish records for other male relatives of Carl who could conceivably have fathered my great-grandfather, but there aren’t many (the family mostly ran to daughters); he had one brother (Jonas)  who could conceivably have fathered Gustaf, and Jonas had two sons who would be possible candidates, and that’s about it. But in looking at the DNA shared with the descendants of Carl and comparing it with what I might expect to share with hypothetical descendants of Jonas, it appears to me very much more likely that Carl is my ancestor.

This would have still been scandalous, of course—maybe more so, since Carl was a married man with three children when Gustaf was born—so the part about “paying the maternal grandparents to bring Gustaf to America” could well have some truth to it.

I’ve tried contacting the DNA matches through ancestry.com, but no response as yet. Has this shared DNA finally solved this longstanding mystery? I guess I need to bone up a bit more on DNA genealogy to see where I go from here.